Extract key testimony Deposition transcriptTrial transcript
Admissions & Key Testimony Extractor
Pull every admission, damaging concession, and 'I don't know' on your key issues out of a transcript — with verbatim Q&A and page:line cites.
By practice
AI prompts for personal injury — plaintiff practitioners
Proving liability, causation, and the full measure of damages for an injured client. Every prompt below assembles with this practice's emphasis already composed in — pick a workflow and fill in the case details.
Your workflows
Build a chronology Medical records
Build the treatment story from the records Cited chronology with permanency and future-care language pulled verbatim.
Open in the builder →
Extract key testimony Deposition transcript
Pull every admission out of the defense depo Concessions, agreements, and convenient memory lapses — with page:line.
Open in the builder →
Find contradictions Mixed / full case record
Tear down the defense expert: report vs. depo New opinions, basis shifts, and undisclosed reliance materials.
Open in the builder →
Draft from the record Mixed / full case record
Draft the demand's facts straight from the record Every sentence cite-backed; gaps listed instead of papered over.
Open in the builder →
Find contradictions Mixed / full case record
Catch the defense story changing between accounts Divergence map plus lock-in → confront cross sequences.
Open in the builder →
Interrogate the file Mixed / full case record
Open a cited Q&A session on the whole file Standing rules: record-only answers, labeled inference, suggested follow-ups.
Open in the builder →
How personal injury — plaintiff practitioners should brief an AI
- Extract key testimony
- Prioritize testimony establishing notice and fault, admissions about the mechanism of injury, and the human impact of the injuries — pain, limitations, and life disruption in the witness's own words.
- Build a chronology
- Give particular weight to provider language on causation, permanency, impairment, and future care needs, and to consistent symptom reporting across providers over time.
- Find contradictions
- Focus on locking defense witnesses into accounts that conflict with the physical evidence or their own documents, and note wherever a defense account has shifted between tellings.
- Summarize the record
- Surface testimony supporting each liability element and each category of damages, and flag favorable concessions prominently rather than burying them in sequence.
- Draft from the record
- Write toward a coherent narrative of fault and harm; specificity about the client's documented losses carries the persuasion — never adjectives.
- Interrogate the file
- Whenever an answer touches damages, state whether the record quantifies them and where; unquantified damages are follow-up work, so flag them.
The full library, through this lens
Every template below opens with the Personal injury — plaintiff emphasis composed into its example.
Draft from the record Mixed / full case recordMedical records
Demand Letter Facts Section
Draft the facts and damages narrative of a demand from the record itself — every sentence cite-backed, gaps flagged instead of papered over.
Draft from the record Mixed / full case record
Deposition Outline from the Record
Build an examination outline straight from the existing record: goals to lock in, exhibits keyed to questions, and sequences that end in commitment.
Find contradictions Mixed / full case recordExpert report
Expert Report vs. Deposition Audit
Audit an expert's deposition against their report: new opinions, abandoned opinions, changed bases, and undisclosed reliance materials — exclusion-motion fuel.
Summarize the record Deposition transcriptTrial transcript
Page-Line Deposition Summary
The classic page-line summary, done right: topic-segmented, admission-flagged, exhibit-tracked, with a ranked excerpt list at the end.
Find contradictions Mixed / full case recordDeposition transcript
Prior Statement Cross-Examination Builder
Align a witness's deposition against every prior statement, classify each conflict, and get a lock-in → confrontation cross sequence with dual cites.
Interrogate the file Mixed / full case recordDeposition transcriptMedical recordsDiscovery responses
Record Interrogation Session Setup
The standing-rules prompt: paste this once at the start of a chat session and every answer after it comes cited, sourced, and honest about gaps.
Build a chronology Medical records
Treatment Chronology Builder
Turn a medical records production into a dated treatment chronology with gaps, pre-existing references, and verbatim causation statements — every entry cited.
A good prompt is an assignment memo.
You already know how to brief an associate. The CITE method is that same skill, pointed at an AI — read the full method, then take the prompt pack with you.
Building legal software? See what's coming for developers.