Extract key testimony Deposition transcriptTrial transcript
Admissions & Key Testimony Extractor
Pull every admission, damaging concession, and 'I don't know' on your key issues out of a transcript — with verbatim Q&A and page:line cites.
By practice
AI prompts for family law practitioners
Financial transparency and best-interests factors, in matters where the parties usually remain in each other's lives. Every prompt below assembles with this practice's emphasis already composed in — pick a workflow and fill in the case details.
Your workflows
Find contradictions Mixed / full case record
Sworn disclosures vs. the record Financial affidavits against the documents; claimed parenting against the texts.
Open in the builder →
Extract key testimony Deposition transcript
Pull income, asset, and parenting admissions What the deposition actually committed them to, verbatim.
Open in the builder →
Summarize the record Deposition transcript
Page-line summary of the spouse's deposition Measured register, ready for the judge or GAL audience.
Open in the builder →
Draft from the record Mixed / full case record
Outline the deposition from the paper trail Exchanges, disclosures, and statements, keyed to exhibits in order of use.
Open in the builder →
Interrogate the file Mixed / full case record
Cited Q&A on the financial production Every answer attributed to its author and date — in this practice, that's the point.
Open in the builder →
How family law practitioners should brief an AI
- Extract key testimony
- Prioritize admissions about income, assets, and liabilities, statements about parenting time and conduct, and — where the record preserves it — tone: how something was said to a co-parent often matters as much as what was said.
- Build a chronology
- Communications and conduct timelines dominate this practice: build them from texts, emails, and exchange records with exact dates and times wherever available, attributing every entry to its author.
- Find contradictions
- Focus on divergence between sworn financial disclosures and the documentary record, and between claimed parenting involvement and what the communications record actually shows.
- Summarize the record
- Organize around the governing factors as the record speaks to them, in a measured register — the likely audience is a judge or guardian ad litem, not a jury.
- Draft from the record
- Keep the tone measured and factual; inflammatory framing reliably backfires in family court, and specificity does the persuading.
- Interrogate the file
- Attribute every answer to its specific source and author; in this practice, who said it and when is usually the point.
The full library, through this lens
Every template below opens with the Family law emphasis composed into its example.
Draft from the record Mixed / full case record
Deposition Outline from the Record
Build an examination outline straight from the existing record: goals to lock in, exhibits keyed to questions, and sequences that end in commitment.
Find contradictions Mixed / full case recordExpert report
Expert Report vs. Deposition Audit
Audit an expert's deposition against their report: new opinions, abandoned opinions, changed bases, and undisclosed reliance materials — exclusion-motion fuel.
Summarize the record Deposition transcriptTrial transcript
Page-Line Deposition Summary
The classic page-line summary, done right: topic-segmented, admission-flagged, exhibit-tracked, with a ranked excerpt list at the end.
Find contradictions Mixed / full case recordDeposition transcript
Prior Statement Cross-Examination Builder
Align a witness's deposition against every prior statement, classify each conflict, and get a lock-in → confrontation cross sequence with dual cites.
Interrogate the file Mixed / full case recordDeposition transcriptMedical recordsDiscovery responses
Record Interrogation Session Setup
The standing-rules prompt: paste this once at the start of a chat session and every answer after it comes cited, sourced, and honest about gaps.
Build a chronology Medical records
Treatment Chronology Builder
Turn a medical records production into a dated treatment chronology with gaps, pre-existing references, and verbatim causation statements — every entry cited.
A good prompt is an assignment memo.
You already know how to brief an associate. The CITE method is that same skill, pointed at an AI — read the full method, then take the prompt pack with you.
Building legal software? See what's coming for developers.