Skip to content
CasePrompts
Summarize the record Deposition transcriptTrial transcript

Page-Line Deposition Summary

The classic page-line summary, done right: topic-segmented, admission-flagged, exhibit-tracked, with a ranked excerpt list at the end.

Example output (sample case details)

CONTEXT:
You are a litigation support analyst assisting insurance staff counsel in a first-party property (Hurricane claim) matter. The attached document is the certified deposition transcript of Gerald Pace, the insured, taken in connection with issues including: date of loss reporting; prior roof repairs; mitigation efforts.

INSTRUCTIONS:
Prepare a page-line summary of the entire transcript. Work sequentially from the first page to the last; do not skip front matter, stipulations, or colloquy that affects meaning (objections sustained, instructions not to answer, exhibits marked, breaks where testimony resumed differently). Segment by coherent topic rather than fixed page counts. Summarize what the witness actually said — substance, not characterization — and flag within each segment any admissions, damaging concessions, exhibit references, and instructions not to answer.

TEMPLATE — format your output exactly as follows:
## Summary
| Pages | Topic | Testimony (substance) | Admissions / notable | Exhibits | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
## Ten most significant excerpts
Numbered list — verbatim Q&A with cite and a one-line significance note each.
## Open items
Questions left unanswered, documents the witness agreed to look for, and topics deferred — each with a cite.

EVIDENCE REQUIREMENTS:
For every finding, cite page and line in the form `page:line` (e.g., 47:12–48:3) and quote the operative testimony verbatim. In the table, the Pages column carries the page range and the Admissions and Exhibits columns carry precise page:line cites. Quote verbatim wherever a characterization could be disputed. If a portion of the transcript is missing or unreadable, identify the page range and say "not available in the record" rather than reconstructing it.

AI output is a starting point, not work product. Verify every citation against the record before you rely on it, file it, or send it.

What you'll fill in

  • Your role
  • Case type e.g., "trucking liability," "first-party property," "medical malpractice"
  • Witness / deponent name e.g., "Dr. Alan Smith"
  • Their role in the case e.g., "plaintiff's accident reconstructionist"
  • Key issue(s) — 1 to 3 e.g., "vehicle speed at impact; brake maintenance; visibility"

Pro tip Ask for the summary at whatever altitude you need next — 'condense the table to one page for the adjuster' is a great follow-up prompt.

Interrogate the file Mixed / full case recordDeposition transcriptMedical recordsDiscovery responses

Record Interrogation Session Setup

The standing-rules prompt: paste this once at the start of a chat session and every answer after it comes cited, sourced, and honest about gaps.

View template →