Litigation AI prompts by tool
CasePrompts prompts are vendor-neutral. Each guide shows where a workflow fits in that product, where it does not, and the first-party sources behind every product claim.
A guide is not a statement that the tool is approved for confidential client material. Use the tier your firm has approved.
Claude
Claude Projects can keep uploaded files and project instructions together across related chats. These prompts provide a scoped assignment, an output format, and source-location requirements; you still need to verify every result against the record.ChatGPT
ChatGPT Projects can group chats, files, and project-specific instructions. These prompts turn a broad request into a more reviewable assignment, but a well-structured prompt does not make an answer accurate by itself.Microsoft 365 Copilot
Microsoft 365 Copilot can work with organizational content the signed-in user is permitted to access. These prompts add a defined task, output format, and record-checking instructions inside that product context.Rev
Rev’s AI Prompts and AI Chat features can analyze a transcript and return results that users can copy with or without timestamps. These templates focus that review on a defined litigation task and a checkable output.Filevine
Filevine documents AI review features that operate on selected project documents and support built-in or custom prompts. These templates give that review a narrower assignment and a consistent output to verify.CoCounsel
Thomson Reuters describes CoCounsel Legal as supporting research, drafting, and document analysis. These prompts can help frame custom direction where the selected workflow accepts it; product grounding does not remove the need for lawyer review.Don’t see your tool? The prompts are written to be model-neutral — open the builder and copy the result, or choose a record-type workflow first.