Workflow catalog · By source
Start with the record, not the model.
Different records need different source coordinates and review checks. Choose the material in front of you, preserve its native citations, and choose the work product you need next.
Deposition transcripts
Use a deposition transcript as a record to navigate, not a story to embellish. Start with the complete transcript and its page-line numbering, ask for a narrow work product, then return to the cited question and answer before using any finding.
Chronology workflowMedical records
Medical-record review works best when each event stays tied to the document that recorded it. Build the chronology from dated encounters, keep provider statements separate from later inference, and make gaps or conflicting entries visible rather than smoothing them over.
Discovery workflowDiscovery responses
Discovery review starts with the request-response pair. Preserve the request number, objections, answer, amendments, and cited production together so a model does not judge a response from a detached excerpt.
Opinion-review workflowExpert reports
Expert review often crosses source types: a report, reliance materials, prior reports, and testimony. Keep those sources distinct, compare stated opinions and foundations, and treat any claimed change or omission as a lead for human review.
Multi-document workflowFull case records
A full case record is not one document. Inventory the sources, preserve separate citation systems, and ask questions in passes so the model does not collapse allegations, testimony, correspondence, and later summaries into a single narrative.
Two ways to use the catalog
Copy the free prompt today. Help evaluate the planned Workbench next.
Each workflow applies the same CITE structure—Context, Instructions, Template, Evidence—but changes the source inventory, citation format, and review checklist to match the record. The planned Workbench turns that contract into a reviewable matter run.