Citations are pointers, not proof.
A pinpoint makes a finding inspectable. It does not make the finding accurate.
Work the record with AI. Every finding cited by page and line.
CasePrompts is a litigation AI workspace for paralegals and attorneys: it runs expert CITE prompts on your case files and returns findings cited by page and line, with files read on your device and an optional zero-retention cloud mode.
Free to start. No signup, no install.
Ask your files
Synthetic data- Your transcript
- Read on this device
- Cited passage
Did the driver see the claimant’s car before impact?
Best matchWebb 47:14–18
“A. I didn’t see it before the impact. Q. You never saw her before impact? A. That’s fair.”
Pick the work. Run it on your file.
Choose a task, record type, and practice to get an expert CITE prompt—or switch to Ask your files to open a transcript here and search it with page:line cites.
Already have a prompt? Check its structure locallyChoose the work — What do you need?
Or start from your practice
From your file to a cited finding.
The same expert prompt runs wherever you choose. The citation rule travels with it.
Open your files
Transcripts, medical records, productions, and reports in .txt, .md, .docx, or .pdf. Page:line is detected on transcripts.
Pick the work
A deposition summary, admissions, a medical chronology, contradictions, or a question about the file—24 expert workflows in all.
Run on your device or in the cloud
Search and answer in this browser, copy a cited prompt into an AI tool your firm approves, or run the whole file with CasePrompts Pro.
Check findings by page:line
Each finding points to its source—page:line, Bates, timestamp, or page. You open it and decide what becomes work product.
Six kinds of record work, built in.
Written by people who produce the record. Each workflow sets the assignment, the output shape, and the citation standard before anyone reads the file.
Summarize the record
AI Page-Line Deposition Summary Prompt
Topic-by-topic deposition summary with page:line on every entry.
Extract from the record
Admissions & Key Testimony Extractor
Verbatim question-and-answer admissions, each with its cite.
Build a chronology
AI Medical Chronology Prompt for Lawyers
Dated treatment events tied to provider, page, and Bates.
Find contradictions
Prior Statement Cross-Examination Builder
Changed accounts side by side, with both source locations.
Draft from the record
AI Deposition Outline Prompt from the Record
Question sequences keyed to the exhibits in the file.
Interrogate the file
Record Interrogation Session Setup
Ask questions about the file; answers cite or say “not found.”
Every workflow begins with a better assignment.
CITE defines who the work is for, what the task is, the output shape, and the source standard. The same CITE prompt runs in Ask your files, in CasePrompts Pro, or in an AI tool your firm approves.
Context
Who you are, the matter, the document, the case posture.
Instructions
The precise task with explicit scope.
Template
The exact output format the AI must fill.
Evidence
Citation requirements — page:line, timestamp, Bates — plus the anti-hallucination directive: if it’s not in the record, say “not found in the record” — never infer.
Same record. Different questions.
A practice lens changes what a workflow looks for—not the requirement to cite the source.
All 12 practice lenses- Civil / insurance defense
Evaluating exposure, testing causation, and developing comparative fault and mitigation — often with carrier reporting in mind.
- Personal injury — plaintiff
Proving liability, causation, and the full measure of damages for an injured client.
- Commercial litigation
Obligations, performance, notice, and damages flowing through contracts and corporate records — Bates discipline throughout.
- Employment litigation
The timeline of complaints, decisions, and documentation; comparator evidence; policy compliance; and decision-maker knowledge.
- Medical malpractice — plaintiff
Standard-of-care language, deviation evidence, expert foundation, and the causation chain through the chart.
- Medical malpractice — defense
Documented clinical judgment, informed consent, comorbidities, alternative-cause evidence, and chart completeness.
AI drafts. You decide.
Current public-tool boundary. The builder assembles prompt text on your device. Files you open in Ask your files are read in this browser and never uploaded; setup links carry allowlisted configuration keys, and matter-specific detail values do not. Review the data path
The professional verifies.
Every workflow ends with a person checking the source and deciding what becomes work product.
Gaps stay visible.
When the record does not support an answer, the prompt asks for “not found in the record” instead of a guess.
On your device, or in the cloud when you choose.
Start free in the browser. When a matter needs the full prompt run across whole files, CasePrompts Pro adds cloud runs beside the on-device tools.
On your device
Available · free- Open .txt, .md, .docx, or .pdf files right in the browser.
- Search passages with page:line cites and copy a cited prompt.
- On-device AI answers with an open model downloaded once Preview
CasePrompts Pro
Private beta- Full expert prompts run on whole files with Claude, alongside on-device review.
- Case files accepted in the cloud only after a Zero Data Retention agreement is in place.
- Free trial runs, then a paid plan. Pricing is announced at launch.
Built from the record outward
I’m Andrew. I’ve spent my career in Florida litigation support—depositions, transcripts, and the certified record.
CasePrompts started because “summarize this” is not a litigation workflow. The CITE library made the assignment clearer. CasePrompts now runs that assignment on your own files and keeps the page and line beside every finding, so source review is part of the work.
The public builder remains a practical, local-first tool, like depoaudio.com. It generates prompt text in your browser, and files you open are read on your device. See how today’s tools handle data.
More about me at andrewmayes.com or on LinkedIn. Something broken, or a template you wish existed? support@caseprompts.com
Common questions
What is CasePrompts?
CasePrompts is a litigation AI workspace for paralegals and attorneys: it runs expert CITE prompts on your case files and returns findings cited by page and line, with files read on your device and an optional zero-retention cloud mode. The prompt builder, 24 expert workflows, 12 practice lenses, Ask your files, and CITE Check are free and need no signup.
Can AI summarize a deposition with page and line citations?
Yes, if the transcript keeps its page and line numbers and the prompt requires a cite for every entry. In Ask your files, CasePrompts detects transcript page:line in the browser and cites each passage it finds. A paralegal or attorney should still open every cited location and confirm the testimony before using the deposition summary.
Are my case files uploaded when I use CasePrompts?
No. When you open a transcript or record in Ask your files, CasePrompts reads it in your browser on your device; the file is not uploaded or stored. The optional cloud mode is a separate choice, and it accepts case files only after a Zero Data Retention agreement is in place.
What does CasePrompts Pro add to the free tools?
CasePrompts Pro runs the full expert prompt on whole case files in the cloud with Claude, alongside the on-device tools. Findings still come back cited by page and line for a person to verify. It starts with free trial runs and then moves to a paid plan; pricing is announced at launch on the pricing page.
Does a citation mean an AI finding is accurate?
No. A page:line, timestamp, Bates, or page reference makes an AI finding easier to inspect, but AI can still omit, misquote, misread, or invent material. Treat every citation as a pointer: open the original record, read the surrounding testimony, and verify each material statement yourself.
Is CasePrompts legal advice?
No. CasePrompts provides litigation workflow and prompt tools for paralegals and attorneys. It is not legal advice, a substitute for professional judgment, or an independent review of the record. The professional decides what becomes work product after checking the cited source.